Armadale-WA web site Human Rights web page

This web page relates to Human Rights, one of the most important things (if not the most important thing) in life.

I will be working on this web page as time goes on.

Every country (even Australia, which is often left behind in most things) needs binding human rights legislation. Many people in Australia, mistakenly believe that international human rights treaties, like the UN International Covenant On Civil And Political Rights, are binding in Australia, and that we have the human rights that are embodied in those documents.

Some people also, mistakenly, believe that we are entitled to the rights of the USA Bill Of Rights, which comes from the USA Amendments to the Constitution, such as the right to bear arms. They are wrong.

See http://www.hcourt.gov.au/speeches/kirbyj/kirbyj_inthrts.htm

For a fairly good declaration of human rights, and, what I think is the earliest real declaration of human rights, see the web page at http://www.historyguide.org/intellect/declaration.html .

See also http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Declaration_of_the_Rights_of_Man_and_of_the_Citizen
and
http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Declaration_of_the_Rights_of_Man_and_of_the_Citizen .

My submission that I made in May 2009, to the Australian Human Rights Consultation Committee (see http://www.humanrightsconsultation.gov.au/ ) is at http://www.armadale-wa.net/politics/HumanRightsConsulationCommitteeSubmission_200905.pdf .

This paragraph about increasing, widespread persecution and harassment in Australia, added 26 October 2009

In Australia, states are increasingly imposing laws banning peaceful association of particular groups of people, and, the police forces are increasingly harassing and persecuting those groups of people, with great glee, and abandoning law enforcement.

This directly contravenes Article 21 of the United Nations International Covenant On Civil And Political Rights, "ratified by Australia", which states "The right of peaceful assembly shall be recognized."

It also contravenes Article 22 of that Covenant, which states "Everyone shall have the right to freedom of association with others".

That Australia is increasingly violating Human Rights to which it has dishonestly agreed, is a glaring indication of the need for a legally binding declaration of civil rights, to which the federal constitution, and, state and territory constitutions, should be subject, as the only means of guaranteeing Human Rights in Australia.



Also added 26 October 2009, this paragraph about embedded gender-based discrimination

Now, for people with an open mind, who can look at life around them objectively, here is a really good example, of systemic sexual discrimination. I was watching a television news broadcast, and the woman that was the newsreader, was wearing a shirt that was open to about eight to ten inches (20-25cm) below the top of her breastbone, or sternum. If the newsreader had been a man, the man would likely be required to be wearing a shirt buttoned up to tight against the throat, and, a tie, tied tightly around the throat, like a garotte. For a man to be dressed formally, or, for work as a professional, the man is required to be wearing a shirt buttoned tight against the throat, and, a tie, tied tight against the throat. But, for a woman to be dressed to what society regards as the equivalent level of dress, the woman can wear clothes with an open front, and, especially, the woman is not required to wear clothes that are tight against the throat. The woman does not even have to wear a collar. For further examples of the discrimination, the next time that you see local government, state and territory parliament, and, federal parliament, sittings, look at the clothes that the members are wearing. If you are in Armadale, go to a city council meeting. Look at what the councillors are wearing. Do all of the males, wear collars and ties? Do all of the females wear collars and ties? Would the male members, be allowed to be present, and performing their roles, if they wore clothes as open around the throat and chest, as the female members? If not, why not? Similarly, at events where people "dress up" - weddings, funerals, formal dinners, etc., look at who is required to wear collars and ties, and, ask yourself, why? The answer is discrimination based on gender. Apart from the issues of the phallic nature of a tie, women do not have to dress to strangle themselves. This is gender-based discrimination, that people appear to ignore, because it is so entrenched in society. But, it is, nevertheless, systemic gender-based discrimination, and, it shows that gender-based discrimination prevails, and is part of society.



This web page is authorised and written by Bret Busby, 2 Pelham Street, Armadale.

I can be contacted by email by clicking on the link at Bret

For issues relating to this web site, send an email to the webmaster by clicking on the link at webmaster

This web page was last updated on 16 December 2009.